Loading

Database ManagersDatabase ManagersCommunity & Help

Database Managers
kilanikilani8 år siden
If you're a user that has long been interested in adding to the database and editing it as well, please join! If you're a user that has been interested in doing this but is too shy to start and has some questions, please join! All users who have interest in helping our database grow and flourish are welcome into the club, no matter how experienced they are.

--under construction, but please feel welcome--
Oppdatert 4 år siden341 brukere1,315 kommentarer

Forum41

Relaterte Artikler1

Kommentarer1,315 kommentarer

Kaneel1 dag siden#83411669There was definitely a discussion about this a longer while back, i'll try and see if i can find it in the alerts.
The same rules which are used for cosmetics should apply, that they should only be added if they come with a container of some sort which makes them a collectable over your regular band aid printed with some motifs.


Thanks! That would make sense and be consistent with all the candy cans. However the definition for "container" is sorta unclear. Take this one for example: ITEM #1045332 It doesnt seem to have anything but the box made of paper (in picture). Would that be considered a qualified container? If so almost all things have such a container I'd say. XD
1 dag siden
Kaneel on Ice
giyunosakedaikon4 dager siden#83256674snip


There was definitely a discussion about this a longer while back, i'll try and see if i can find it in the alerts.

The same rules which are used for cosmetics should apply, that they should only be added if they come with a container of some sort which makes them a collectable over your regular band aid printed with some motifs.
1 dag siden
Hi,

I have a question about whether bandage like this ITEM #1045332 is allowed in the database. Initially I thought no since the rule states No perishable or single use goods (items you usually dispose of after use).

But then I found some other bandage entries ENTRY #159101

So I wonder if it's within the scope of the database and if yes why it doesnt fall into the quoted rule.

Thank you!
4 dager siden
Eccmy1 måned siden#81923501Hmmm... Can you please find a good quality picture with both bodies having the head attached on them, just like the 5 other entries in that collection?
(Especially considering that, if ITEM #1031060 you've recently added is to be believed, it looks like she, like the rest of the collection, has an alternate hairstyle head).
If yes, I'd be happy to update the entry with it. Thanks in advance!
Maakie1 måned siden#81924337I am unfortunately not able to find better (maybe NEFERE has more luck as they were also able to find the other pictures). ;)
Interesting, the current entry for ITEM #167526 makes it seem like it only comes with one head/hairstyle as well. I doubt it actually does and I expect there to be a second head as well, but can't find any more info or pictures. *edit* Seems like only 1 person on here owns the figure (also the original creator of the entry), I guess we could ask?
I've tried to find a photo of the girl with an alternate head on blogs and auctions (www.mbok.jp/ite..., page.auctions.y..., www.mbok.jp/ite..., grassblog.blog5...) but failed. Looks like it's included only with clear version of the figure.
1 måned siden
Maakie1 måned siden#81754863Yeah, it's more like a 2-in-1 issue. For reference, other clear version figures are in the database like this: ITEM #16854 . If someone manages to find (official) pictures of the figures I mentioned assembled, it would solve the whole issue, though. ^^''
I think not (but someone please correct me if I'm wrong) as the database rules say:
Music - anime, Japanese video-games, idols and seiyuu related CDs.


My doubt is about the fact that it's a japansese translation of the story, performed by japanese seiyuu and released by a japanese company, so it seems to be in a bit of a grey area. And since it seems that they plan to released a few more similar series, it would be good to decide how we'll proceed with such items.
1 måned siden
Eccmy1 måned siden#81923501Hmmm... Can you please find a good quality picture with both bodies having the head attached on them, just like the 5 other entries in that collection?
(Especially considering that, if ITEM #1031060 you've recently added is to be believed, it looks like she, like the rest of the collection, has an alternate hairstyle head).
If yes, I'd be happy to update the entry with it. Thanks in advance!


I am unfortunately not able to find better (maybe NEFERE has more luck as they were also able to find the other pictures). ;)

Interesting, the current entry for ITEM #167526 makes it seem like it only comes with one head/hairstyle as well. I doubt it actually does and I expect there to be a second head as well, but can't find any more info or pictures. *edit* Seems like only 1 person on here owns the figure (also the original creator of the entry), I guess we could ask?
1 måned siden
Maakie1 måned siden#81913140
Also (since it's not a draft), could you make this www.suruga-ya.j... the main picture of ITEM #167526 ? Thanks!

Hmmm... Can you please find a good quality picture with both bodies having the head attached on them, just like the 5 other entries in that collection?

(Especially considering that, if ITEM #1031060 you've recently added is to be believed, it looks like she, like the rest of the collection, has an alternate hairstyle head).

If yes, I'd be happy to update the entry with it. Thanks in advance!
1 måned siden
Nefere1 måned siden#81814606Sure, I'm happy to help!
The one (or two if we count a clear version) that wasn't in the collection in the database is ENTRY #2414 - a red haired girl with a side ponytail. The blog mentions her too.
Actually, the normal version was added to the database years ago ITEM #167526 but photos don't show her bikini parts and the collection is mentioned in a version field and not as a classification.


What you mention I've seen many times before in older entries. Either the rules were different back then or classifications didn't exist yet. I added the clear version entry. Now the set should be complete in the database. Thanks for the help again! ^^

Eccmy1 måned siden#81878893Looks like you can't link a classification to its source origin.
I tried, but the option apparently isn't available.


That is odd, seems like something that would make the database a lot better? I'll add it in the suggestions forum. :)

Also (since it's not a draft), could you make this www.suruga-ya.j... the main picture of ITEM #167526 ? Thanks!
1 måned siden
Maakie1 måned siden#81814582Now there is only one mystery left, the set descriptions mentioned at multiple places there should be 6 figures (12 incl variants) in total, but I can't find the 6th one mentioned anywhere (also don't own it myself). Nefere1 måned siden#81814606Sure, I'm happy to help!
The one (or two if we count a clear version) that wasn't in the collection in the database is ENTRY #2414 - a red haired girl with a side ponytail. The blog mentions her too.
Actually, the normal version was added to the database years ago ITEM #167526 but photos don't show her bikini parts and the collection is mentioned in a version field and not as a classification.

I've fixed the Classification field problem of ITEM #167526 for you, since that entry wasn't drafted.
As for the item's bikini parts, do note there's a photo of it linked to the entry: PICTURE #766201

Maakie1 måned siden#81814582
Also, it's been a while since I worked actively on the database, am I doing something wrong or am I not allowed to add origins to this classification ENTRY #203671 ? Would be nice to add the related series to it.

Looks like you can't link a classification to its source origin.
I tried, but the option apparently isn't available.
1 måned siden
Maakie1 måned siden#81814582Well, that basically solved all of my issues and I was just able to make the entries, thank you so much! :D
Now there is only one mystery left, the set descriptions mentioned at multiple places there should be 6 figures (12 incl variants) in total, but I can't find the 6th one mentioned anywhere (also don't own it myself).
Sure, I'm happy to help!

The one (or two if we count a clear version) that wasn't in the collection in the database is ENTRY #2414 - a red haired girl with a side ponytail. The blog mentions her too.

Actually, the normal version was added to the database years ago ITEM #167526 but photos don't show her bikini parts and the collection is mentioned in a version field and not as a classification.
1 måned siden
Welcome to Entertainment Hobby Shop JUNGLE!

Crew

Administrator(er)

Medlemmer341